Knowledge Reception and Verification in COVID-19 Socio-scientific Choice-Making: A Grounded Theory Among Grade 10 Learners in a Rural Community in the Philippines
PDF

Keywords

decision making
knowledge reception
knowledge verification
socio-scientific issues
grounded theory

How to Cite

Knowledge Reception and Verification in COVID-19 Socio-scientific Choice-Making: A Grounded Theory Among Grade 10 Learners in a Rural Community in the Philippines. (2025). WVSU Research Journal, 14(2), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.59460/wvsurj.142263.2025

Abstract

Socio-scientific issues are complex, ill-structured, and open-ended, often lacking definitive solutions. Managing the COVID-19 pandemic required practical decisions that guided interventions to promote health-enhancing behaviors. Effective decision-making in such contexts involves integrating knowledge from diverse sources, yet challenges remain in how knowledge is received and verified during crises. This grounded theory research examined knowledge reception and verification as critical processes in socio-scientific decision-making. Twenty-five informants were purposefully selected for interviews, drawing activities, and field observations. Data collection followed Hennink and Kaiser’s (2022) steps to achieve theoretical saturation, employing code frequency counts, comparative methods, stopping criteria, higher-order groupings, and code meanings. Findings revealed that knowledge reception occurred through auditory and visual senses, including problem-situation knowledge from social media, self-care knowledge from families, political and economic knowledge from local government, experiential knowledge from communities, and conceptual knowledge from schools. Verification of knowledge involved assessing source referents and comparing multiple sources. Received knowledge also triggered emotional responses that influenced decision-making. From these categories, the Theory on Knowledge Reception and Verification in Socio-scientific Decision-Making was developed. While limited by the characteristics of its informants, setting, and the COVID-19 context, the study provides context-specific explanations of decision-making within a rural Filipino community. It highlights how contextual, cultural, and emotional factors shape responses to crises, offering an interdisciplinary framework rarely described by other decision-making theories. Future research may expand this framework by examining how communities in varying contexts receive and verify knowledge, informing localized responses during uncertainty.

 

PDF

References

Afifah, U. (2023). Rationalism in philosophical studies. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 4(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v4i1.730

Alampay, L. P. (2024). Cultural values, parenting and child adjustment in the Philippines. International Journal of Psychology, 59(4), 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.13117

Alvi, J., & Rehan, N. M. (2022). Role of senses in the construction of knowledge. Global Journal of Business Economics and Management Current Issues, 12(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjbem.v12i1.5780

Anzaldo, G. D. (2021). Modular distance learning in the new normal education amidst covid-19. International Journal Of Scientific Advances, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.51542/ijscia.v2i3.6

Ayala, E., Fuertes, W., & Jarrin, F. (2024). Critical thinking skills in research process, a literature review. an input to propose a new measurement instrument to gauge critical thinking. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61707/pwy5df19

Bass, S. B. (2020). “why don’t they just do what we tell them?” risk communication in the time of covid-19. CommonHealth, 1(3), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.15367/ch.v1i3.415

Berawi, M. A. (2020). Empowering healthcare, economic, and social resilience during global pandemic covid-19. International Journal of Technology, 11(3), 436. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v11i3.4200

Berger, J. (2025). What gets shared, and why? Interpersonal Communication and word of mouth. Annual Review of Psychology, 76(1), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-013024-031524

Best, A. L., Fletcher, F. E., Kadono, M., & Warren, R. C. (2021). Institutional distrust among African Americans and building trustworthiness in the COVID-19 response: Implications for ethical public health practice. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 32(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2021.0010

Bratianu, C., Vătămănescu, E.-M., Anagnoste, S., & Dominici, G. (2020). Untangling knowledge fields and knowledge dynamics within the decision-making process. Management Decision, 59(2), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2019-0559

Cavazza, N., & Roccato, M. (2024). Personal experiences with the National Healthcare System and Institutional Trust in times of COVID‐19. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.13029

Cebesoy, U. B., & Rundgren, S. C. (2021). Embracing socioscientific issues-based teaching and decision-making in teacher professional development. Educational Review, 75(3), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2021.1931037

Chai, J., Weng, Z., & Liu, W. (2021). Behavioral Decision making in Normative and Descriptive Views: A Critical Review of literature. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(10), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14100490

Chhachhar, A. R., Nizamani, M. Q., & Ali, M. (2023). Challenging times of covid-19 pandemic: Social Media Infodemic. Journal of Journalism, Media Science & Creative Arts, 3(1), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.56596/jjmsca.v3i1.61

Conlon, C., Timonen, V., Elliott-O’Dare, C., O’Keeffe, S., & Foley, G. (2020). Confused about theoretical sampling? Engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319899139

Corwin, Z. B., & Clemens, R. F. (2020). Analyzing fieldnotes: A practical guide. Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977159.00047

Coşkun, K. (2020). A new explanation for the conflict between Constructivist and Objectivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920938280

Crivelli, D., Acconito, C., & Balconi, M. (2024). Emotional and cognitive “route” In decision-making process: The relationship between executive functions, psychophysiological correlates, decisional styles, and personality. Brain Sciences, 14(7), 734. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14070734

Dang, H. L. (2021). Social Media, Fake News, and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Sketching the case of Southeast Asia. Advances in Southeast Asian Studies, 14(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0054

Del Castillo, F. (2023). Pakikipagkapwa-tao as a mode of inter-religious dialogue in the contemporary Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8015

Diesen, G. (2022). Source credibility: Creating experts to herd the masses. Russophobia, 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1468-3_4

Dimitrov, B. (2021). The axioms in my understanding from many years of experience. Axioms, 10(3), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10030176

Dix, A., Gill, S., Hare, J., & Ramduny-Ellis, D. (2022). Body and mind. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 89–111). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198718581.003.0005

Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J., Schmid, P., Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N., Kendeou, P., Vraga, E. K., & Amazeen, M. A. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y

Fei, D. (2020). From ‘the mind isolated with the body’ to ‘the mind being embodied’: Contemporary approaches to the philosophy of the body. Cultures of Science, 3(3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096608320960242

Finley, S., & Howard, A. (2024). Does grounded theory have a place in graduate research? American Journal of Qualitative Research, 8(3), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/14889

Foley, G., Timonen, V., Conlon, C., & O’Dare, C. E. (2021b). Interviewing as a vehicle for theoretical sampling in grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920980957

Galang, J. R. F., Gopez, J. M. W., Gozum, I. E. A., & Sarmiento, P. J. D. (2021). Social distancing as a recontextualization of Filipino values and Catholic religious practices: A response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(5), 3245–3264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01361-z

Gans-Combe, C. (2022). Trust in institutions or the scientist? the drivers and mechanisms of trust in research and innovation as a means to improve related political outcomes. Ethical Evidence and Policymaking, 56–85. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447363972.ch003

Godbout, P. (2023). Situation awareness: A pivotal process for sensemaking and decision making in the learning and practice of physical activities. Athens Journal of Sports, 10(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajspo.10-3-3

González-Padilla, D. A., & Tortolero-Blanco, L. (2020). Social media influence in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Braz j Urol, 46(suppl 1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.s121

Hennink, M., and Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science and Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Ismail, N. (2023). Power relations in changing the culture of the community power relations in changing the culture of society. INFERENSI Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 17(2), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.18326/infsl3.v17i2.281-304

Israelashvili, J. (2021). More positive emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic are associated with better resilience, especially for those experiencing more negative emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648112

Kim, J. W., Lee, J., & Dai, Y. (2023). Misinformation and the paradox of trust during the covid-19 pandemic in the U.S.: Pathways to risk perception and compliance behaviors. Journal of Risk Research, 26(5), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2023.2176910

Kisa, S., & Kisa, A. (2024). A comprehensive analysis of COVID-19 misinformation, public health impacts and communication strategies: A scoping review (Preprint). Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/56931

Kumar, B. V., & Shailaja, N. (2024). Social Exchange Theory: Exploring reciprocity, equity, and relationship management in diverse contexts. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.32850

Lacorte, J. H. (2024). Knowledge and emotions in socioscientific decision making. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i4.367

Lacorte, J. H. (2025). Characteristics of knowledge in socioscientific decision making. Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 4(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.56556/jssms.v4i1.1135

Lan, J. (2024). Emotional Influences on individual decision-making: A comprehensive literature review. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 49(1), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/49/20231925

Leblanc-Sirois, Y., Gagnon, M., & Blanchette, I. (2022). Affective states during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: Progression of intensity and relation with public health compliance behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883995

Lokesh, R., Sullivan, S., Calalo, J. A., Roth, A., Swanik, B., Carter, M. J., & Cashaback, J. G. (2022). Humans utilize sensory evidence of others’ intended action to make online decisions. Scientific Reports, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12662-y

Loreau, M. (2023). Reunifying knowledge of body and mind. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 113–122). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628430.003.0010

Majid, U., Wasim, A., Bakshi, S., & Truong, J. (2020). Knowledge, (mis-)conceptions, risk perception, and behavior change during pandemics: A scoping review of 149 studies. Public Understanding of Science, 29(8), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520963365

Martikainen, J., & Hakoköngäs, E. (2023). Drawing as a method of researching social representations. Qualitative Research, 23(4), 981-999. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211065165

Medina, B. T., & Medina, M. C. (2023). The elderly in the Filipino family. Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research, 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1530-353520230000023016

Montibeller, G., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (2024). Behavioral Decision Research: Descriptive and Prescriptive perspectives. In International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science (pp. 15–40). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44424-1_2

Muthia, E., Reynaldhi, N., Margolang, P. A., & Syahputra, H. (2024). Peran Pengalaman dalam Pembentukan Pengetahuan: Perspektif Filsafat Empirisme. Mauriduna Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.37274/mauriduna.v5i2.1354

Parcon, J. V. (2020). Istorya sa plasa: The Ilonggo plaza as a communication context. Philippine Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 25, 18–44. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/148673406.pdf.

Pareek, S., & Goncalves, J. (2024). Peer-supplied credibility labels as an online misinformation intervention. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 188, 103276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103276

Pedroso, J. E. (2021). Students’ views from webinars: A qualitative study. International Journal of Arts and Humanities Studies, 1(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijahs.2021.1.1.6

Pedroso, J. E., Tubola, L. F., & Aquidado, E. J. (2023). Facebook Messenger: As means of communication for academic inquiries. Journal of Digital Learning And Distance Education, 2(2), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i2.116

Rabb, N., Geana, M., & Sloman, S. (2023). Communities of knowledge in trouble. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(2), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231187997

Ribeiro, J. M., De Oliveira, E. S. F., & Gonçalves, R. F. L. (2021). Contexts of qualitative research in health. Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem, 74(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167.2021740101

Rizma, N. S., & Dewi, N. E. (2024). Epistemologi : Rasionalisme, empirisme, kritisisme, pragmatisme positivisme dan positivisme logis. Sinar Dunia Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.58192/sidu.v3i1.1799

Rodriguez, R. L., Padilla, J. R., Montefalcon, M. D., Abisado, M., & Raga, R. (2023). The post behind anonymity: A thematic discourse analysis of Facebook posts from confession pages in different Universities in the Philippines. In 2023 11th International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) (pp. 529–533). https://doi.org/10.1109/iciet56899.2023.10111104

Saarimäki, H. (2021). Naturalistic stimuli in affective neuroimaging: A review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.675068

Sarfo, J. O., Debrah, T. P., Gbordzoe, N. I., Afful, W. T., & Obeng, P. (2021). Qualitative research designs, sample size and saturation: Is enough always enough? Journal of Advocacy, Research, and Education, 8(3), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.13187/jare.2021.3.60

Saroh, S. (2024). The philosophy of rationalist. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 4(3), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v4i3.782

Sigauke, I., Swansi, K., & Tsvara, P. (2020). Scaling up grounded theory: Problems, implications and options for qualitative researchers. East African Journal of Education And Social Sciences, 1(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2020v01i01.0007

Sher, S., McKenzie, C. R., Müller-Trede, J., & Leong, L. (2022). Rational choice in context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(6), 518–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221120387

Szuster, A., Huflejt-Łukasik, M., Karwowska, D., Pastwa, M., Laszczkowska, Z., & Imbir, K. K. (2022). Affective attitudes in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: The dynamics of negative emotions and a sense of threat in Poles in the first wave of the pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13497. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013497

Talaoui, Y. (2023). The situation of incommensurability in strategic management. Symphonya Emerging Issues in Management, 1, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.4468/2023.01.06talaoui

Thomas, H., & Earthy, S. (2023). Qualitative interviews. Encyclopedia of Health Research in the Social Sciences, 269–274. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800885691.ch49

Uy, H. O. (2023). A cross-case analysis on filial care assumption among Filipino adults. Medical Research Archives, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i11.4605

Wang, S. (2023). Can different contexts affect memory recall? Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 2214–2219. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4679

Williams, J. R. (2021). Publicity and common commitment to believe. Erkenntnis, 88(3), 1059–1080. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00393-x

Yamao, S. (2024). Social exchange theory. In Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (pp. 274–279). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035308767.ch35

Yixuan, W. (2023). Cross-cultural comparison of family education in China and the west: A study centered on Ang Lee’s film trilogy. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(23). https://doi.org/10.25236/ajhss.2023.062311

Zheng, D. (2020). Building resident commitment through tourism consumption: A relational cohesion lens. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 16, 100441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100441

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 WVSU Research Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.