Keywords
experience
video-based module
How to Cite
Abstract
This study aims to determine the experience of students in using video-based module. The study was conducted in two public high schools in the Philippines in the second semester of School Year 2021-2022. This qualitative research, specifically narrative inquiry, used ten purposively chosen students as participants based on specific criteria. To elicit the needed data, the participants were given a researcher-made structured interview questionnaire, which were validated by experts. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The groundbreaking findings underscore the transformative potential of video-based modules, unveiling a dynamic realm of learning that effortlessly elevates student retention and engagement. It is evident that harnessing the power of video-based modules stands as a captivating and potent strategy to enhance students' grasp of complex concepts. Furthermore, the modules beckon for broader horizons, with larger-scale studies encompassing diverse populations and innovative data collection methods poised to further illuminate this exciting frontier in education.
References
Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. Education Resources Information Center (ERIC).
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.
Bui, A. K., & Bui, N. P. (2018). Using IATA to analyze, assess and improve the quality of the multiple-choice questions in chapter power functions, exponential functions and logarithmic functions. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 54(9), 81–93.
Bui, N. Q. (2017). Assessment of the quality of multiple choice test bank for the module of Introduction to Anthropology by using the RASCH model and QUEST software. Science of Technology Development, 20(X3), 42–54.
Cartwright, F. (2007). IATA 3.0 Item and Test Analysis: A software tutorial and theoretical introduction.
Doan, H. C., Le, A. V., & Pham, H. U. (2016). Applying 3-parameter logistic model in validating the level of difficulty, discrimination and guessing of items in a multiple choice test. Ho Chi Minh city University of Education Journal of Science, 7 (85), 174-184.
Du Toit, M. (2003). IRT from SSI: Bilog-MG, Multilog, Parscale, Testfact. Scientific Software International.
Foster, R. C. (2021). KR20 and KR21 for some nondichotomous data (it’s not just Cronbach’s alpha). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(6), 1172-1202. Berggren, J. L. (2023) Calculus. Encyclopedia Britannica.
Boateng, R., Boateng, S. L., Awuah, R. B., Ansong, E., & Anderson, A. B. (2016). Videos in learning in higher education: Assessing perceptions and attitudes of students at the University of Ghana. Smart Learning Environment. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0031-5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Deakin University Library. (2023). Narrative Inquiry. Deakin University Library. https://deakin.libguides.com/qualitative-study-designs/narrative-inquiry#:~:text=Narrative%20inquiry%20records%20the%20experiences,ordered%20into%20a%20chronological%20narrative.
El-Sayed, R. E. H., El-Hoseiny, S., & El-Sayed, E. (2013). Video-based lectures: An emerging paradigm for teaching human anatomy and physiology to student nurses. Alexandria Journal of Medicine, 49(1), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2012.11.002
Gherhes, V.; Stoian, C.E.; Farcasiu, M.A.; Stanici, (2021) M. E-Learning vs. face-to-face learning: Analyzing students’ preferences and behaviors. Sustainability, 13, 4381. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su13084381
Jabbar, Q. (2016). Enjoyable e-Learning Modules: Developing and Evaluating. International Journal of Computer Applications. 145. 42-47. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016910706.
Miller, S., Martinez, M., Meadows, L., & Davis, R. (2018). The effectiveness of video tutorials on learning calculus in a community college setting. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 4(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.406903
Nguyen Phu Loc, Tran Cong Thai Hoc. (2014). A Survey Of 12th Grade Students' Errors In Solving Calculus Problems. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 3(6).
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-ii_5f07c754-en
Trilestari, K. & Almunawaroh, N. F. (2020). E-Module as a solution for young learners to study at home. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 513.
Vidianti, A. & Wijaya, J. E. (2019). The Effectiveness of using interactive electronic modules on student learning outcomes in education innovation course. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 422
Wu, W. L., Hsu, Y., Yang, Q. F., Chen, J., & Jong, M. (2021). Effects of the self-regulated strategy within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on students’ learning performances in an art history class. Interactive Learning Environments. 31. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1878231.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001316442199253
Kumar, R., & Indrayan, A. (2011). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian Pediatrics, 48, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-011-0055-4
Lam, Q. T. (2011). Measurement in Education - Theory and Application. Hanoi: Vietnam National University Publishing House.
Nguyen, P. H. (2016). Using GSP chart and ROC method to analyze mutiple-choice test items and assess learning outcomes of students. Journal of Education Science, Vietnam Institute of Education Science, 134(11), 32–37.
Nguyen, P. H. (2017). Using GSP chart and ROC method to analyze and select mutiple-choice test items. Dong Thap University Journal of Science, 24(2), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.52714/dthu.24.2.2017.426
Nguyen P. H., & Du, T. N. (2014). Assessing the rating results and predicting students’ learning outcomes based on grey relational analysis and grey model. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 32, 43–50.
Nguyen, P. H., & Du, T. N. (2015). The analysis and selection of mutiple-choice test items based on S-P chart, Grey Relational Analysis, and ROC curve. Ho Chi Minh city University of Education Journal of Science, 6 (72), 163.
Nguyen, P. H., & Trinh, T. K. B. (2017). Assessment of students’ learning outcomes a combination of GSP chart and ROC method. AGU International Journal of Sciences, 17(5), 103–112.
Nguyen, P. H., & Trinh, T. K. B. (2022). Assessment of Students’ Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. International Journal of Uncertainty and Innovation Research, 4(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.34238/tnu-jst.5554
Nguyen, V. C., & Nguyen, P. H. (2020). Analyzing and Selecting Multiple-Choice Test Items Based on Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory. Ho Chi Minh city University of Education Journal of Science, 17(10), 1804-1818.
Pham, T. M., & Bui, Đ. N. (2019). The IATA software for analyzing, evaluation of multiple-choice questions at Ha Noi Metropolitan University. Scientific Journal of Ha Noi Metropolitan University, 20, 97–108.
Rasch, G. (1993). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Education Resources Information Center (ERIC).
Rizopoulos, D. (2006). ltm: An R package for latent variable modelling and item response analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 17(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i05
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2012). Standard setting: The application of the receiver operating characteristic method. International Journal of Medical Education, 3, 198–200). https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.506f.1aaa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 WVSU Research Journal